The text "The Revolution Will
Not Be Polite: The Issue of Nice Versus Good" by Rachael is a blog post
that talks about the definition of social justice, and what it means to live in
a world where we can actually enjoy more justice and more equality. To do that,
the writer starts by defining social justice, saying that it is, essentially, to
wipe out "systematic marginalization and privilege". She argues that
living in a socially just world is infinitely different than living in a world where
everybody is nice to you, that "niceness" or "politeness"
are just not the same as "goodness". This confusion between two very
different terms is causing a problem for her cause because some people try to
get away with being racist or misogynistic or homophobic just because they are
"nice". The writer also sets out to define "privilege" which
she believes has been misunderstood, and is at the root of thinking that social
privilege is about being "nice". She defines a "privileged"
group of people as one that is given certain advantages over others, while a
"marginalized" group of people is one that has these advantages taken
away. The writer moves on to emphasize the control that the dominant class gets
over marginalized classes because manners tend to be defined by the former.
This leads to oppressors creating an outline to the actions of the people they
oppress and, through that, even being able to control any attempt to end the
oppression. Towards the end of the post, the writer reinforces the fact that
the idea of oppression is, simply, about every right or opportunity that you
are denied because of your race, ethnicity, gender, etc... To conclude, the
writer advocates a kind of social revolution against oppression, as she has
defined it, and against our current mindset which promotes "nice" as
opposed to "good".
Check moodle for grade. The main idea is not accurate. Don't quote in summary. The body of the summary is good. Be careful not to misrepresent the text.
ReplyDelete